Linux Format forums Forum Index Linux Format forums
Help, discussion, magazine feedback and more
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

GNOME 3
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Linux Format forums Forum Index -> Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
RedWillow
LXF regular


Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 2:05 pm
Posts: 719

PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 11:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ajgreeny wrote:

Perhaps it's just my older hardware that gives the problems?


Possibly. If you can't get gnome shell or Unity that points to a graphics card problem. What is it, and which driver?

By the way, don't be influenced by the number of complaints about Unity on Ubuntu forums. I've been following them as well. Many are puerile. Most are misinformed. And, interestingly, there's a backlash just beginning to manifest with people posting "I happen to like Unity - stop all your negative whingeing" type posts.

Human nature, really. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ajgreeny
LXF regular


Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 453
Location: Oxfordshire.

PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 12:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RedWillow wrote:
ajgreeny wrote:

Perhaps it's just my older hardware that gives the problems?


Possibly. If you can't get gnome shell or Unity that points to a graphics card problem. What is it, and which driver?

By the way, don't be influenced by the number of complaints about Unity on Ubuntu forums. I've been following them as well. Many are puerile. Most are misinformed. And, interestingly, there's a backlash just beginning to manifest with people posting "I happen to like Unity - stop all your negative whingeing" type posts.

Human nature, really. :)

My desktop has an ATI 9200SE card running the radeon driver, but it runs compiz will all the bells and whistles with no problem on 10.04. The old laptop has an other ATI card, but this time an ATI 9000M. It also runs compiz with no problem in 10.10. I thought unity depended on being able to run compiz, but there must be more to it than that, I presume.
_________________
Xubuntu 12.04 user, and loving it!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chrishall57



Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 2:13 pm
Posts: 45

PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 12:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tried the LXF disk, dumped me to Gnome 2 Sad

I do have it running on mint Mint on my laptop and I do like it. Couple of annoying niggles at this early stage to adopt it permanently though. Anyways, Gnome 2 still does the business.
_________________
http://thesignofthecross.blogspot.com
Trisquel 5.0 / Antix M11
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cwr



Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:08 pm
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 12:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I tried the Gnome 3 interface on a desktop, and it was pretty much a nightmare; I couldn't actually do anything useful, since Gedit immediately crashed, but I could mouse around in a typical workflow pattern.

I suppose the most characteristic example of the new, improved GUI was the volume control; it now takes up a 2x3 inch square on my screen, where the old one took 1.75x0.375, for the same functionality, and the new bar is horizontal, not vertical, giving no immediate affordance as to the direction of movement. And this is interface design?

You can't (or at least I couldn't) remove the lower toolbar, which I ditched long ago. You can't simply click between windows, keeping work on one, docs on another, and junk on a third. You can't even configure a theme, apparently, without resorting to the command line, which according to the developer is a wonderful new feature ...

A window full of icons is the only way to handle a smartphone or a netbook, but for a desktop machine it's all pain. Gnome are going to have to produce something for desktops at some point, or they'll just become irrelevant.

Gnome 2.32 will last me a while, despite its rough edges, but I really don't know where to turn after that dies of old age. It took five years or so for Gnome 2.x to be reasonably well documented and useful, and I can't see 3.x reaching that state any more quickly.

Pity, really - Will
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
felis_silvestris



Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:23 am
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 5:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry, I have been away and then busy, and failed to keep my eye on the replies that have built up here. Please note that the cheat sheet to which Brian Hunter provided a link in his post provides a solution to the specific problem I was experiencing, which I didn't manage to find myself. The keybinding to move between open virtual desktops / workspaces is Ctrl+Alt+Up/Down arrow, which is frankly less intuitive than just clicking on a little box in the panel, but does the job perfectly well. I'm still not convinced that I can be bothered to move back from XFCE, which is an extremely comfortable working environment for anyone used to the previous version of GNOME, but I will put some more time into using the new interface.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ajgreeny
LXF regular


Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 453
Location: Oxfordshire.

PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 9:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to agree with you about xfce being probably the best option for those of us who don't like either unity or gnome 3 shell. I had not even really looked at xfce before, but having seen the current moves I have spent some time with a live USB of xubuntu 11.04, and it is excellent; so much better than unity, and I think that when gnome 2 goes, as it surely will, and the classic desktop is no longer available, xfce will become my refuge.

PS, I have put lubuntu on my netbook and on that it is fabulous; it boots from power switch to full usable desktop in about 20 secs, and is less power hungry than ubuntu's gnome, which was on there before. So lxde could also be another port in my unity/gnome 3 storm; not so easily configurable as xfce, but still extremely good.
_________________
Xubuntu 12.04 user, and loving it!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cwr



Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:08 pm
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2011 5:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've done some digging, and the authors of Gnome 3 seem pretty clear - they've written the new interface for unskilled users (hence no configuration), with touch-screen interfaces as a major emphasis.

That's reasonable, since mobile phones and netbooks are fashionable, but they appear to have no clue that desktops are a different niche. I hate using menus on my phone (which is a very old and unsmart one); on a limited interface five or ten icons make things much easier. However, a desktop screen full of ten or twenty unlabelled icons is a really bad idea. And I want my computer to do what I tell it to do, not what someone else thinks might be useful.

It looks as if moving to {something else} is the only long-term solution, but fortunately there's no rush. It'll be interesting to see where most Gnome users end up.

Will
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
felis_silvestris



Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:23 am
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the nod towards LXDE. I'm using it today, after two days of patiently sticking with the new GNOME, and it has been really excellent so far: the one aspect in which it scores over XFCE for me is that it works far better with Chromium, on my system at least.

I'm still not impressed by GNOME 3, Shell, whatever. I fully appreciate that I might have a completely different user experience if my use of it was purely recreational, but I'm a small business user, which must be the case for many people using RHEL related distros, and it seems to have become unduly constrictive and complicated to do the mundane boring things I need to do every day with my desktop box. If I wanted this kind of heavily managed interface, I would go out and buy a Mac.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SpecialStuff



Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 53

PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2011 11:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think a few people are trying it out on Ubuntu 11.04 (and earlier in some cases), and I don't think that's the best place to see it at it's best. Just looking at various recent YouTube videos with Gnome 3 on Ubuntu Natty reveals it's in a fairly poor state and isn't at it's best there. I'm running it on Opensuse 11.4 and it's been brilliant, with only a couple of minor issues. Certainly I've been happy to move to it as my main OS and DE. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBJNBfbmpfQThis one is a good example, with the desktop clearly glitching out and whatnot. It's something I haven't seen on the Opensuse version. It's a pity if people are basing their opinions of it on Ubuntu's unfinished implementation of it, is what I'm trying to say.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MartyBartfast
LXF regular


Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:25 am
Posts: 814
Location: Hants, UK

PostPosted: Wed May 18, 2011 1:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I upgraded to Fedora 15 yesterday and I really don't like Gnome3, so had to stick xfce on PDQ. I'll revisit Gnome3 occasionally to see if it grows on me, but at the moment I can't see it.
_________________
I have been touched by his noodly appendage.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shaddack



Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 6:03 pm
Posts: 71
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I tried out Gnome 3 on Fedora 15 (booted from live CD) and I like it! I don't understand the criticism. I just tried it out quite briefly but I liked what I saw. I think it would suit me quite well!

As far as I understand it is only Fedora and OpenSuse that provide Gnome 3 as a default desktop. Now I'm wondering over which one of these to use. I've had some problems with Fedora in the past when it comes to hardware compatibility. I have never tried OpenSuse.

Is it possbile to get Gnome 3 with Debian?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
loebus
LXF regular


Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:22 pm
Posts: 165
Location: Here

PostPosted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm using Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, 10.10 and 11.04 all using gnome 2.

I've downloaded Ubuntu 11.10 and ran in virtualbox and disliked instantly. From when I tried it was uncustomizable.

Might try again if this happens:
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/?p=19106

I just have one panel, with gnome menu, dockbarx, windows applets and system tray. Compiz works and I use Synapse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pfnorris



Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 4:13 pm
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 9:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have been using gnome3 for a couple of months now. Mainly on Arch, but also on open suse and mint. After some initial scepticism I am now completely sold on it, helped in no small part by JR's article a couple of months ago on customising it with themes and extensions.

There are quite a lot of extensions available now, that will allow most people to get some sort of user experience that suits them, and bear in mind that this is still the .0 release. Over the next few releases it should start to develop and mature quite nicely.

I now find that I miss it when I have to use a machine using an earlier desktop.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
felis_silvestris



Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:23 am
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I started this thread, I feel that I should post that I've been trying out GNOME 3.2 on Fedora 16, & really feel that the specific issues that made me grumble when the shell was first released have been addressed, one way or another, over the last 9 months.

I can now get all the functionality I need for everyday use without recourse to Cinnamon or Unity: there is still some loss of convenience, but it's balanced by the improvements over GNOME 2.

I was really dreading the kind of prolonged misery that KDE users I know suffered when version 4 was introduced, and feel that the GNOME developers are due kudos for being flexible while maintaining their vision for the desktop.

Please consider my words, hat, whatever, eaten.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Brian Hunter



Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:44 pm
Posts: 84
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm using Gnome3 on Fedora 16 as well and I like it. Suits how I use my computer. I launch all my programs by pressing the special key, and typing the first few characters of the program and pressing enter to launch. Thatís how I setup any docks to run anyway.

90% of my computing time at home is done within the browser anyway, so my browser versions has much more of an impact on me these days! :p
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Linux Format forums Forum Index -> Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Linux Format forums topic RSS feed 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


Copyright 2011 Future Publishing, all rights reserved.


Web hosting by UKFast