| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tiddler
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 3:00 pm Posts: 7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nelz Moderator

Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:52 pm Posts: 8002 Location: Warrington, UK
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's an interesting and well presented argument. Especially the point about invading the privacy of those hosting the web site or communicating through it, which means even an opt-in by the ISP's customer would not be enough. _________________ Unix is user-friendly. It's just very selective about who it's friends are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ScottAS
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:34 am Posts: 49
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Deleted.
Last edited by ScottAS on Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:38 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nelz Moderator

Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:52 pm Posts: 8002 Location: Warrington, UK
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd just ask them outright, do they have their own servers and infrastructure? Of course, even if they are independent now, you have no guarantee they won't be taken over in future. As for BT intercepting your data, it's just a binary stream at their level, while it may be possible in theory, in practice it would be all but impossible. _________________ Unix is user-friendly. It's just very selective about who it's friends are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ram LXF regular

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:44 pm Posts: 1552 Location: Guisborough
|
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Was Rebecca using BT last summer. Read Mike's reply here _________________
Ubuntu LXDE 12.04 running on AMD Phenom II*4; ASUS Crosshair III Formula MB; 4 GB Ram.....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nelz Moderator

Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:52 pm Posts: 8002 Location: Warrington, UK
|
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's done using cookie tracking on the ad servers. Every time you load an ad on a page, it tracks the type of page containing it and gets a profile of the sites you visit. However, because it is not done by your ISP, it does not contain any information to identify you personally, and it can be avoided by not loading ads or by rejecting cookies from ad servers. Phorm is far more intrusive. _________________ Unix is user-friendly. It's just very selective about who it's friends are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ScottAS
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:34 am Posts: 49
|
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Deleted.
Last edited by ScottAS on Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nelz Moderator

Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:52 pm Posts: 8002 Location: Warrington, UK
|
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
planet.net.uk is owned by Energis Squared, the Internet arm of Energis, a large telco (Energis were part of Powergen and use fibre optics running over the National Grid). So it looks like your ISP is using Energis's network and their transparent proxies too. _________________ Unix is user-friendly. It's just very selective about who it's friends are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ram LXF regular

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:44 pm Posts: 1552 Location: Guisborough
|
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Also have a look at this _________________
Ubuntu LXDE 12.04 running on AMD Phenom II*4; ASUS Crosshair III Formula MB; 4 GB Ram.....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ScottAS
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:34 am Posts: 49
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Deleted.
Last edited by ScottAS on Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ScottAS
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:34 am Posts: 49
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Deleted.
Last edited by ScottAS on Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:11 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ollie Moderator

Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:26 pm Posts: 2749 Location: Bathurst NSW Australia
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm just getting an error page
Phorm is really polarising the community against ISPs who have implemented or are looking to implement this system. Consumers need to put their ISP on notice that they will leave, considering Phorm as a breach of contract for inspecting data, and change to an ISP without Phorm.
Edited once to make Dutch_Master's comment seem wrong 
Last edited by ollie on Sat May 31, 2008 2:09 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dutch_Master LXF regular
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:49 am Posts: 2354
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Even worse: that error is from an IIS server
Btw Ollie, there's a typo: | Quote: | | and change to an ISP with Phorm. | You probably meant: | Quote: | | and change to an ISP without Phorm. |  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ollie Moderator

Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:26 pm Posts: 2749 Location: Bathurst NSW Australia
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dutch_Master wrote: | Even worse: that error is from an IIS server  |
Isn't IIS mandated by the UK government  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
badger_fruit
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:53 pm Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the question of phorm being legal or otherwise in my opinion is irrelevent; if the ISPs are going to do this then it should be an OPT-IN system, as it is, it's an opt-OUT system. I have already written to my ISP (Virgin) and told them I wish to opt-out, they replied with a standard response of "it's not in effect yet blah blah, we'll notify users before we go ahead blah blah".
Another example of corporate greed doing what's in the best interest of shareholders instead of the users. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|