Linux Format forums Forum Index Linux Format forums
Help, discussion, magazine feedback and more
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

KDE or GNOME
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Linux Format forums Forum Index -> Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  

KDE or GNOME
KDE
69%
 69%  [ 23 ]
GNOME
15%
 15%  [ 5 ]
Something else
15%
 15%  [ 5 ]
Total Votes : 33

Author Message
shaman47



Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 6:07 pm
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that people only like KDE because most distros have KDE as default, so its the first thing they see and use and first is usually allways best! And people who are new to linux, but have used win95 and later, will quckly get used to KDE, whereas Mac users will probably get used to gnome quite quick.

KDE FOREVER!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
A-Wing
LXF regular


Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:25 pm
Posts: 460
Location: Wellingborough

PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 8:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I really can't get on with KDE, I've tried but its just not for me. I think Gnome is more of an office feel to it. Maybe its just me Smile
_________________
Andrew Hutchings, Linux Jedi
www.a-wing.co.uk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Erin
LXF regular


Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 8:35 pm
Posts: 141
Location: The Olde Smoke south of the River

PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Have no KDE or Qt apps at all on my PCs. Agree with Andy and his summary of KDE and GNOME. Tnd to use GNOME but will use Xfce and Fluxbox to lighten the overhead.

Don't like Nautilus but Xfe, GQview and Ubuntu allow suitable productivity. Still would prefer stability over uprevving versions. Never found a stable KDE release and stuff still crashes under GNOME too but far less.

Erin
_________________
Just beneath my skin I'm screaming. Faithless::Insomnia.
Dual PIII 550 with Ubuntu [semi-bleeding].
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
A-Wing
LXF regular


Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:25 pm
Posts: 460
Location: Wellingborough

PostPosted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 10:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I haven't really played with many other WMs but I remember Fluxbox being good (used it a couple of years ago).
My basic desktop consists of the standard Ubuntu layout with a few more app icons (such as terminal) and an extra Unix time clock just before the switcher (for my work with the mailservers).
The stability problems in KDE are what initially brought me to Gnome. The only crash I remember having in Gnome is a bad codec in Totem.
I can see KDE being good for Windows converts, to show off a Linux based desktop and for home PCs.
It sounds silly but one of my pet peeves with KDE is KMail has quite poor handling of IMAP.
I seem to just be able to do my work quicker in Gnome, and I guess that is what counts for me (plus I am the only one in the office without a machine riddled with spyware)
_________________
Andrew Hutchings, Linux Jedi
www.a-wing.co.uk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Rhakios
Moderator


Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:18 am
Posts: 7634
Location: Midlands, UK

PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OTOH, perhaps this is a better idea Wink
_________________
Bye, Rhakios
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jlarue



Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:40 am
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm, I guess I'm the only Gnome fan, here. I don't HATE KDE. 3.4 is quite nice. But the menu structure is ludicrous; so much crammed in here and there that it never feels integrated to me.

Gnome, from 2.8 on, feels focused and elegant to me. (But I agree about "spatial browsing" in Nautilus --ugh. I turned it back to the original browser style, and had done with it.) Moreover, the applications I use (Firefox, Tbird, Jpilot, OOo/Abiword) "fit" into Gnome better than in KDE.

But I try to keep current in both, and toggle back and forth when I get bored. It's important to keep the brain alert.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
davecs
LXF regular


Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 530
Location: Dagenham, Essex

PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 8:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The latest Firefox, Thunderbird and 1.9.113 onwards of OpenOffice actually adapt to KDE quite well!
_________________

Asus Asus M2N32 WS Pro+Athlon AM2/4200+ — GeForce 7600GT — 2Gb Cosair VS RAM — 500Gb WD5000AAKS SATA Drive — PCLinuxOS
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jer1ch0
LXF regular


Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 11:42 am
Posts: 135
Location: Ireland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 12:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Using kde in SuSe now. 8 text editors and them all 3 or 4 clicks away.
Gnome. 1 text editor 2 or 3 clicks away
And between aptitude and synaptic, well nothing can touch them. They really are the future of Linux Package Management.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jjmac
LXF regular


Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:32 am
Posts: 1996
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 12:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

>>
I think that people only like KDE because most distros have KDE as default, so its the first thing they see and use and first is usually allways best! And people who are new to linux, but have used win95 and later, will quckly get used to KDE, whereas Mac users will probably get used to gnome quite quick.

KDE FOREVER
>>

point being ?

I suppose people only do windows because it comes as default on pre-built boxes, and as it's the first distro experianced because of that and first is usually alwas the best ...

WINDOWS FOREVER

Rolling Eyes


jm
_________________
http://counter.li.org
#313537

The FVWM wm -=- www.fvwm.org -=-

Somebody stole my air guitar, It happened just the other day,
But it's ok, 'cause i've got a spare ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
A-Wing
LXF regular


Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:25 pm
Posts: 460
Location: Wellingborough

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jer1ch0 wrote:

Gnome. 1 text editor 2 or 3 clicks away


Or 1 click if you put a shortcut to it on your top bar like most people do (or anywhere else for that matter).
_________________
Andrew Hutchings, Linux Jedi
www.a-wing.co.uk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
M0PHP
LXF regular


Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:40 am
Posts: 737
Location: Bishop Auckland, County Durham, UK

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

*cough* XFCE forever!! Cool *cough*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
youlikeicecream
LXF regular


Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:40 pm
Posts: 721
Location: Oxford

PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

At first I like KDE ... but after trying gnome im not going back, here's why :

- File searching is much more reliable in gnome
- Network browsing on mixed windows ads domains/workgroups actually works reliably in gnome. And did not need to configure anything other than how I would get my IP. Whereas I had a nightmare trying to get smb4k to work reliably, although sometimes it would find network servers and mostly would not.
- Kde has too many configuration tools that do the same thing and can be confusing.
- Gnome has working theme/icon/gdm installers, which I never got to work in kde. I was able to download tar files point gnome at them and install them, kde would complain that they were not valid themes - blah blah

Please dont get me wrong but I do love Kde too, particularly Amarok, and the nice features of konqueror in Kde3.4

At the end of the day, I think these two desktop environments suit different users. If you have time to piss about with a temperamental system that has all the fancy features you could shake a stick at; go for kde.

If you are in a business or educational environment, then you simply don't have the time to support Kde, and therefore Gnome is a more reliable choice.

Mike Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
nelz
Site admin


Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:52 pm
Posts: 8466
Location: Warrington, UK

PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You don't need smb4k to browse a network with KDE, just type smb:// in the Konqueror's location bar.

While I agree with your comments about the amount of configuration in KDE (which is no bad thing when you're a control freak Smile) I don't find it at all temperamental. It works out of the box, and with a little effort can be customised to work exactly how you want it to.

Konqueror is particularly useful if you take the time to explore the possibilities (some of which are very poorly documented). For example, I'm working on a web site right now, testing changing on a copy on a local server, then uploading them to the live, remote server. I have a Konq window open with one tab showing the test site, one showing the live site and a third tab split into two pane. One pane is an FTP connection to the remote site, the other is an SSH connection to the test site, from which I can open files in Kate and copy them to the live site, without needing to copy anything to my desktop box.

Add in a bit of DCOP scripting, as I did for some tasks when compiling the DVDs, and it becomes even more powerful, but it does require some effort from the user.


Last edited by nelz on Wed Aug 10, 2005 10:52 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
youlikeicecream
LXF regular


Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:40 pm
Posts: 721
Location: Oxford

PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 10:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I did try smb:// and smb:\\ and it gave me error messages all over. but hey

Personally I love Konqueror and have it installed in Gnome and it works perfectly.

Its all very well saying this about the two but neither of them fully 'work-out-of-box' both had sound problems amongst other bits and bobs


at the end of the day there are features in both that are usefull .

Mike Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
graham
Site admin


Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 37

PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just for the record, I think it's a single forward slash:
Code:
smb:/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Linux Format forums Forum Index -> Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Linux Format forums topic RSS feed 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


Copyright 2011 Future Publishing, all rights reserved.


Web hosting by UKFast