 |
Linux Format forums Help, discussion, magazine feedback and more
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Marrea LXF regular

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:32 pm Posts: 1846 Location: Chilterns, West Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 9:57 pm Post subject: Xorg - the arguments drag on |
|
|
I thought I would install Debian 5 (from LXFDVD118) on my old Satellite Pentium III laptop today, and very nice it is too. Unfortunately when I booted into my new system, the resolution had been set to 800x600 when what I wanted was 1024x768. Annoyingly, System > Preferences > Screen Resolution had two options only, 800x600 and 640x480. However, after some tweaking of the automatically configured xorg.conf, I managed to obtain the required 1024x768 and all is well with the world.
In connection with this, I was amused to come across the slightly ill-tempered discussion at http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=37194 from which it appears I am not the only one frustrated by this supposed improvement.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
roseway LXF regular
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 2:27 pm Posts: 402
|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:38 am Post subject: RE: Xorg - the arguments drag on |
|
|
You're certainly not the only one. This is a recurring theme in the Debian user forums. Most of the time, automatic configuration works and all is fine, but when it doesn't work, and the user is a newbie, it causes great frustration. _________________ Eric |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marrea LXF regular

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:32 pm Posts: 1846 Location: Chilterns, West Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:00 pm Post subject: Re: RE: Xorg - the arguments drag on |
|
|
| roseway wrote: | | Most of the time, automatic configuration works and all is fine, but when it doesn't work, and the user is a newbie, it causes great frustration. |
Yes, indeed, that is my point. If the resolution is wrong a newbie would no doubt expect simply to go to the GUI System > Preferences > Screen Resolution and select the right resolution. But what do they find when they get there? Two resolutions only, neither of which is the one they want. More experienced users obviously know that xorg.conf will need to be edited but a newcomer wouldn't know that and, even if they did, they would probably be rather apprehensive at the thought of messing around with a configuration file.
I suppose you might argue that a newbie shouldn't be using Debian - but when you think about it, why do there have to be "easy" Linuxes and "hard" Linuxes?
For instance, I can use SUSE and Ubuntu and most of the time absolutely nothing goes wrong. But with eg Zenwalk - much as enjoy using that particular distro - as soon as I do any updates, wham no X server. This seems to happen to me with each successive zw version I try. And it usually takes me a while to fix it. I was happily using zw 6.0, did some updates, and on reboot no X server. Just constantly repeating errors about "Starting up X11 session manager... INIT: Id "x1" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes".
After some considerable research I discovered that the solution was to install cairo. But by the time I had discovered that, I had got into such a muddle fiddling about with things like xorg.conf and inittab I didn't know where I was. And I have to confess I took the easy way out and did a reinstall, which I hate doing as it is an admission of failure. But, in my opinion, updates should not cause these hiccups. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paulm LXF regular
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 5:53 am Posts: 216 Location: Oxfordshire, UK
|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:41 pm Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Xorg - the arguments drag on |
|
|
At the moment, Zenwalk current is nice and stable, but the same cannot be said for the snaphot repos.
I've lost the ability to scroll with the touchpad on my laptop, and ended up with similar problems regarding starting X.
A lot of it seems to be down to Netpkg/Xnetpkg playing silly games with deps. For the moment at least, you are much better off using Zendo/ZPM for updates.
Its also a good idea to avoid the snapshot repos just after a release - they tend to be broken for a while....
paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rhakios Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:18 am Posts: 7473 Location: Midlands, UK
|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:28 pm Post subject: Re: RE: Xorg - the arguments drag on |
|
|
| Marrea wrote: | but when you think about it, why do there have to be "easy" Linuxes and "hard" Linuxes?
|
It's called choice. Newbies (and anyone else who wants an easy life) should just be thankful that there are easy Linuxes and leave the hard ones to those who want them. The idea that the hard Linuxes should change to suit those who are not suited to using them is, to my mind, perverse. _________________ Bye, Rhakios |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nelz Moderator

Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:52 pm Posts: 8002 Location: Warrington, UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:14 am Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Xorg - the arguments drag on |
|
|
It's not easy and hard, it's different types of easy. To a new desktop user, a nice pointy-clicky GUI is easy. To an experienced sysadmin looking after 100 machines spread through four buildings, it would be a nightmare, whereas a shell one-liner, piping several arcane looking text processing commands, would be the easy way to update or reconfigure them all. _________________ Unix is user-friendly. It's just very selective about who it's friends are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marrea LXF regular

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:32 pm Posts: 1846 Location: Chilterns, West Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:40 pm Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Xorg - the arguments drag on |
|
|
| paulm wrote: | At the moment, Zenwalk current is nice and stable, but the same cannot be said for the snaphot repos.
A lot of it seems to be down to Netpkg/Xnetpkg playing silly games with deps. For the moment at least, you are much better off using Zendo/ZPM for updates. |
Hmm. The repo I'm using is distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/zenwalk/i486/current, so from what you say I should be fairly safe with that?
I've not used Zendo. I must give it a try. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marrea LXF regular

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:32 pm Posts: 1846 Location: Chilterns, West Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:19 pm Post subject: Re: RE: Xorg - the arguments drag on |
|
|
| Rhakios wrote: | | The idea that the hard Linuxes should change to suit those who are not suited to using them is, to my mind, perverse. |
I suppose in a way that idea is rather akin to the current trend for exam pass marks to be steadily lowered in order that no one, however stupid, is allowed to fail. I find the thinking behind that completely misguided.
However, notwithstanding, I hereby suggest lowering each and every distro's ease of use level so that no one, absolutely no one, could possibly fail to be up and running with all the basic procedures in two minutes flat.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marrea LXF regular

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:32 pm Posts: 1846 Location: Chilterns, West Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:49 pm Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Xorg - the arguments drag on |
|
|
| nelz wrote: | | To a new desktop user, a nice pointy-clicky GUI is easy. To an experienced sysadmin ... piping several arcane looking text processing commands, would be the easy way to update or reconfigure ... |
I appreciate the point you are making, nelz. But to me it's not so much a matter of GUI or command line. As you may know, I'm a long-time Windows user and athough I'd never touched DOS I still found it reasonably easy to pick up the fundamentals of the Linux command line. However, even though I find a knowledge of the command line extremely useful (some tasks can be completed far more quickly that way), most of the time I prefer to work with the GUI in Linux.
No, what I have always found puzzling about different distros is why, when some of them seem to have perfected a technique of updating without destroying X on reboot, others seem completely incapable of doing so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
towy71 Moderator

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:11 pm Posts: 4169 Location: wild West Wales
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:19 pm Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Xorg - the arguments drag on |
|
|
| Marrea wrote: | | No, what I have always found puzzling about different distros is why, when some of them seem to have perfected a technique of updating without destroying X on reboot, others seem completely incapable of doing so. | Well that is obvious Marrea, if it messes up X then you are stupid, not the developers
I think that if the developers can't upgrade without breaking something then they are idiots annd ought to be pilloried mercilessly, perhaps made Home Secretary too  _________________ still looking for that door into summer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rhakios Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:18 am Posts: 7473 Location: Midlands, UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:39 pm Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Xorg - the arguments drag on |
|
|
The day all distros become easy for novices to install and update, someone will release ABL (Awkward B4stard Linux) just to make sure that not all distros are easy to use.
It might even be me.  _________________ Bye, Rhakios |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nelz Moderator

Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:52 pm Posts: 8002 Location: Warrington, UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:18 pm Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Xorg - the arguments drag on |
|
|
What's this X thing you refer to?  _________________ Unix is user-friendly. It's just very selective about who it's friends are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marrea LXF regular

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:32 pm Posts: 1846 Location: Chilterns, West Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:45 pm Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Xorg - the arguments drag on |
|
|
| nelz wrote: | What's this X thing you refer to?  |
I'm not really sure. With its propensity for suddenly disappearing I haven't really had the chance to get to know it that well.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ollie Moderator

Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:26 pm Posts: 2749 Location: Bathurst NSW Australia
|
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:09 am Post subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Xorg - the arguments drag on |
|
|
| nelz wrote: | What's this X thing you refer to?  |
Isn't it part of the sum "X + Y = Z"? So when someone adds Y to W we'll have graphics system Z that auto configures with all possible resolutions, colour depths and 3D effects supported by the monitor and graphics card.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jjmac LXF regular
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:32 am Posts: 1996 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:05 am Post subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Xorg - the arguments drag on |
|
|
Marrea wrote:
>>
In connection with this, I was amused to come across the slightly ill-tempered discussion
>>
Yes, deb sites can be just as <um> interesting </um> as any other.
And it is a good example of the folly of automation. It reminds me of a tv episode i saw once, can't remember the program, it might have been the Bill. But this bloke walks into an apartment that is fully automated (grin). A few floors up. He then found, after closing the door, that he couldn't get out. Couldn't open a window, could get the fridge to open (hehehe) (total_snigger.png). It was a couple of days later until he was found and the apartment was slightly damaged by that time.
No xorg.config --- outrageous on the part of X. Easily solved with a saved xorg.config. No saved config ... outrageous on the part of the user.
A mode line can be extracted from /var/log/Xorg.0.log with the appropriate part pasted in ... if needed, as such, it appears i didn't need to ...
| Code: |
.
.
.
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Default Screen"
Device "Default Video Card"
Monitor "Default Monitor"
DefaultDepth 16
.
.
.
SubSection "Display"
Depth 16
Modes "1280x960" "1024x768" "800x600"
EndSubSection
.
.
.
|
Just noticed , i don't have an explicit modeline set ... very good too, such a modern world it is.
It shouldn't really take 4 pages of thread to thrash out though ...
Marrea wrote:
>>
I suppose in a way that idea is rather akin to the current trend for exam pass marks to be steadily lowered in order that no one, however stupid, is allowed to fail. I find the thinking behind that completely misguided.
>>
Unfortunately their the only ones who have families that can afford the fees, as is the case here in .au.
It is something to think about is it not, the next time your faced with a youngish grade armed with a dentist drill who says ..."open wide please"
nelz wrote:
>>
It's not easy and hard, it's different types of easy.
>>
For new installs as such, it does suggest to me a certain lack of real world experience to only provide for the automatic setup. Or, it could be some twisted subtle case of developers revenge !, for some reason.
jm _________________ http://counter.li.org
#313537
The FVWM wm -=- www.fvwm.org -=-
Somebody stole my air guitar, It happened just the other day,
But it's ok, 'cause i've got a spare ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|