| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Peri
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:38 am Posts: 8 Location: Missouri, USA
|
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 7:32 am Post subject: Buttons on the wrong side... |
|
|
I was really put off by the window control buttons being moved. That is the sort of thing I have come to expect from Microsoft and Apple. Mentally composing a message to express my disgust. But after a few minutes of research, found this thread and several other sources explaining the easy ways to change it back. (I just reselected to one of my previously configured themes, and they were back on the right)
After I thought about it, I realized this is what is great about open source. They changed something, which pleases some, irritates others, but (unlike MS and Apple) they left a very easy way for us to have our own preference. _________________ Everything has been said before, but since no one listens we have to keep going back and beginning all over again.
—André Gide
There's no point in listening to other people. The're either going to agree with you, or say stupid stuff.
—Dogbert |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LeeNukes LXF regular

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:11 pm Posts: 954 Location: At the bar
|
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| wyliecoyoteuk wrote: | | there is hardware RAID, which has a dedicated controller and needs no drivers, software RAID which is run entirely in the OS and runs on standard Disk controllers, and software RAID on Motherboards that pretends to be hardware RAID, but needs a software driver to support it in the OS -fakeRAID. |
I'm pretty sure hardware RAID requires drivers too. There is a risk of seeing the disks through the controller otherwise. And other problems, but I've defiantly experienced seeing the disks through the controller. _________________ Join GiffGaff and get £5 free credit |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nelz Moderator

Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:52 pm Posts: 8002 Location: Warrington, UK
|
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hardware RAID requires no RAID drivers, they are in the controller's BIOS. The card presents the RAID array as a single disk. There is no way to access the individual disks except through the controller's management software. The only driver required for the OS is a SCSI-like driver to access the card.
Note I mentioned card, hardware RAID is rarely found on motherboards and never on consumer grade ones. _________________ Unix is user-friendly. It's just very selective about who it's friends are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LeeNukes LXF regular

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:11 pm Posts: 954 Location: At the bar
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wyliecoyoteuk LXF regular

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:41 pm Posts: 3359 Location: Birmingham, UK
|
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All of our RAID cards present the array as a single volume.
Their BIOS boots first, and they have their own dedicated controller hardware.
aacraid is the driver for the disk controller, in a similar way to an IDE controller needing a driver.
Software RAID sits on top of a standard IDE or SATA controller, and so does FakeRAID, except some of it is in firmware on the motherboard.
So, yes they need a driver, but their disk management is handled by their own BIOS and processor.
Whereas the software and fakeraid need software processing and CPU time to make standard BIOS chipset controllers behave like dedicated ones. _________________ The sig between the asterisks is so cool that only REALLY COOL people can even see it!
*************** ************
Last edited by wyliecoyoteuk on Tue May 04, 2010 9:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LeeNukes LXF regular

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:11 pm Posts: 954 Location: At the bar
|
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wyliecoyoteuk wrote: | All of our RAID cards present the array as a single volume.
Adaptec IIRC.
Their BIOS boots first. |
Yes, but the driver is loaded at boot and prior to installation. I've had hardware RAID cards not supported in Linux not show any drives at all. _________________ Join GiffGaff and get £5 free credit |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
donoreo LXF regular

Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:49 pm Posts: 788 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| LeeNukes wrote: | | wyliecoyoteuk wrote: | All of our RAID cards present the array as a single volume.
Adaptec IIRC.
Their BIOS boots first. |
Yes, but the driver is loaded at boot and prior to installation. I've had hardware RAID cards not supported in Linux not show any drives at all. | You are correct. I have had to install drivers in older RHEL installs on hardware raid (HP, IBM and Dell!) _________________ I cannot deny anything that I did not say. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wyliecoyoteuk LXF regular

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:41 pm Posts: 3359 Location: Birmingham, UK
|
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
see edited post
Quick of the mark or what
Should have been clearer.
No RAID drivers, only device drivers for hardware RAID.
or if you prefer no RAID management software.
The main difference is that the OS does not see the disks. _________________ The sig between the asterisks is so cool that only REALLY COOL people can even see it!
*************** ************ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nordle LXF regular

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:56 pm Posts: 1497
|
Posted: Sun May 16, 2010 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just broke my golden rule. Instead of waiting 3 months after release, waited 2 weeks. Decided to ugrade xubuntu 9.10 to 10.04
Ooops.
Initially fine, everything went well. None of the grub issues that plagued early adopters.
But, cannot use thunar in detailed view, rendering it almost useless. Making it VERY irritating to use the desktop.
I thought, how is it possible to release with something so bad, I mean, how could it be missed.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exo/+bug/520118
It wasn't missed. In fact, its been around since beta1, 3 months!
The current simplest workarounds are to use ctrl+1,2,3 after each click to avoid the lockup. But this doesn't fix that the keyboard shortcuts of ctl+c +ctrl+v fail to work.
So really, its either used some hacked version of pcmanfm, or, as I've done, switch to single click activation. This takes some getting used to.
Not brilliant for an LTS release.
I don't think most Ubuntu users will be affected, just users of XFCE and related apps. _________________ I think, therefore I compile |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ollie Moderator

Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:26 pm Posts: 2749 Location: Bathurst NSW Australia
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have you tried the workaround for Thunar over on the Debian User Forums?
edit > prefererences > behavior
set navigation to single click |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rhakios Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:18 am Posts: 7473 Location: Midlands, UK
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ollie wrote: | Have you tried the workaround for Thunar over on the Debian User Forums?
edit > prefererences > behavior
set navigation to single click |
Try reading nordle's post again... _________________ Bye, Rhakios |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
drdrambuie
Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 11:22 pm Posts: 1
|
Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 11:34 pm Post subject: 10.04 - Install under 20m, startup under 15sec for Dell D610 |
|
|
| The subject says it all for me. I was gobsmacked. It even recognized my Novatel Wireless Mobile Broadband USB device with no issue or. To be fair I have not tried my wireless NIC but everything else worked fine. Even special key combinations for brightness |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rhakios Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:18 am Posts: 7473 Location: Midlands, UK
|
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone who fancies a change from the crusty old beardies who usually advocate Linux (or in this case Ubuntu Linux) could do worse than have a look at this YouTube review.
Ahem, she does a few other Linuxy things too. _________________ Bye, Rhakios |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wyliecoyoteuk LXF regular

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:41 pm Posts: 3359 Location: Birmingham, UK
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, I think Nixie is great.
 _________________ The sig between the asterisks is so cool that only REALLY COOL people can even see it!
*************** ************ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nordle LXF regular

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:56 pm Posts: 1497
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep, Nixie is cool. Most of her posts are funny, creative and laden with enough geekyness to make me not feel too pervy for adding her to the sub list.
To be honest, surprised not to see her snapped up by something like tech tv / revision3 etc _________________ I think, therefore I compile |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|