| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
aviceda
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 12:18 pm Posts: 1 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2005 12:31 pm Post subject: Wireless Broadband-best distro? |
|
|
Hi All,
I've recently been offered a subsidized installation of wireless broadband by the Australian government and want to use Linux rather than MS (if possible!)
I've looked at several distros over the past couple of years Mandrake, Fedora etc though I'm quite impressed by Suse, can anyone let me know what their feelings are?
Any advice gratefully received,
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LXFRulz
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 12:15 am Posts: 13
|
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2005 4:41 pm Post subject: Ubuntu is great with D-Link cards! |
|
|
I've got to say that Ubuntu is the only distro I have used where my wireless card was recognized right away. All I had to do was enter the WEP key and go, and it works every time I boot the computer. I don't have to re-enter the WEP key, it is saved, for the next time, and the latest version even allows me to save different settings for different wireless points with their appropriate WEP keys.
Of course that is with D-Link cards. Linksys cards use the NDISwrapper, for their drivers. (Which was on one of the last LXF DVD's)
I'm am totally happy with Ubuntu as a home computer, their website has all the information to add mpeg, avi, wmv video to your Unix system, plus, I like trying out new software packages all the time, and Synaptic kicks but as a package manager.
That's just one reporters opinion though!
________
Honda Insight history
________
Honda CM185T
Last edited by LXFRulz on Thu Feb 03, 2011 11:57 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jer1ch0 LXF regular
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 11:42 am Posts: 135 Location: Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2005 11:58 pm Post subject: RE: Ubuntu is great with D-Link cards! |
|
|
SuSe seem to have an excellent distro - tried quite a few but have not tried the latest 9.3.
But I've being messing with Linux for a few years and Ubuntu has been the distro that I've been waiting for.
My 2 cent worth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jlarue
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:40 am Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 12:55 am Post subject: RE: Ubuntu is great with D-Link cards! |
|
|
| I've only had two distributions that allowed me to quickly set up a wireless connection: PCLinuxOS and Mepis. Both have straightforward, graphical tools that work. Today, I may be able to add a third -- BeatrIX. It did give me an odd error message, but it came up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
davecs LXF regular

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:13 am Posts: 530 Location: Dagenham, Essex
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 9:38 pm Post subject: RE: Ubuntu is great with D-Link cards! |
|
|
If you have your Broadband connection via Ethernet, then any distro should work. If you have plenty of RAM at least 256Mb, I would install of a LiveCD like PCLinuxOS (my favourite) or Mepis, and you can see if your hardware and connection are detected before you install. They are easy installs, and PCLOS comes with Java and Realplayer already integrated into Firefox.
If you have less memory, try something like Mandriva or SuSE. _________________
Asus Asus M2N32 WS Pro+Athlon AM2/4200+ — GeForce 7600GT — 2Gb Cosair VS RAM — 500Gb WD5000AAKS SATA Drive — PCLinuxOS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bigbee

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 3:46 pm Posts: 55 Location: Westerlo, Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 9:24 pm Post subject: RE: Ubuntu is great with D-Link cards! |
|
|
Suse 9.2-9.3 detected my wifi broadband connection without any problem (after configging the security keys etc)
I personally think everything depends on the hardware you are using. If you're using a very recent wireless NIC there can be problems about the drivers being non-available by default (and you end up building your modules yourself)... But many of the available cards are supported. Some research on google probably will do the trick
GL with it _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
reklan

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:41 am Posts: 84 Location: Doncaster, Yorkshire
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Recent Distro's I've used on my HP Laptops that have worked with the wireless card are:-
Suse 11.4, Ubuntu 10.10 and Mint 10.
all found the card from the start. _________________ Don't Dream it....Be it.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rhakios Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:18 am Posts: 7483 Location: Midlands, UK
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| reklan wrote: | Recent Distro's I've used on my HP Laptops that have worked with the wireless card are:-
Suse 11.4, Ubuntu 10.10 and Mint 10.
all found the card from the start. |
Sadly those distros weren't available six years ago.  _________________ Bye, Rhakios |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
reklan

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:41 am Posts: 84 Location: Doncaster, Yorkshire
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
lol didn't notice the date.
For some reason it was showing as a new topic for me..
 _________________ Don't Dream it....Be it.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M-Saunders Moderator

Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:14 pm Posts: 2883
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| reklan wrote: | For some reason it was showing as a new topic for me..
|
Some spammer bumped the topic. In virtually every case where a years-old topic gets a random reply, it's a spammer.
M |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
khakilang LXF regular
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:26 am Posts: 110
|
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Why a post still exist after 6 years? Should been deleted by now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M-Saunders Moderator

Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:14 pm Posts: 2883
|
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| khakilang wrote: | | Why a post still exist after 6 years? Should been deleted by now. |
Huh? Why? What if a post contains really useful information, should it just be deleted because it's old? What about discussions about the philosophy of free software that aren't time-sensitive?
Or do you want to go through many thousands of older threads, individually picking out what you think is useful, and what is not? Go nuts
M |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|