Linux Format forums Forum Index Linux Format forums
Help, discussion, magazine feedback and more
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

September issue: ROUNDUP Text Editors -- some corrections

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Linux Format forums Forum Index -> Magazine and coverdiscs
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
filker0



Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:37 pm
Posts: 1
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA

PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 3:37 am    Post subject: September issue: ROUNDUP Text Editors -- some corrections Reply with quote

I looked around in the forums for the 'Vim vs. Emacs" topic, or even a related one, but was unable to find it, so (though it's probably out there someplace), I figured that I'd correct a few glaring historical errors in the article:

The original vi editor was based on the line editor ex, not ed. To this day, many Unix (and Linux) admins have an EXINIT variable set in the .login, .profile, or .bash_profile given to users by default. ed was much less sophisticated than ex, and I found it much easier to use myself.

In the coverage of GNU Emacs, Eliza is an adaptation of the Doctor program, which was a simulation of a rather distracted psychiatrist, not a text based adventure game. Not that there isn't a text based adventure game in the GNU Emacs distribution, it's just that Eliza is not it. Further, there's a vi emulation mode in the distribution, and lots of other things. As an added historical note, Emacs was originally a set of screen based editing macros for the Teco (Text Editor and Corrector) editor on, I think, a DecSystem 10 or 20. You'll have to ask RMS about that one.

Left out of the roundup, and maybe deservedly so based on features, was David G. Conroy's "Micro Emacs", or me. Many light weight text-mode "screen based" editors written between the mid 1980s and well into the late 1990s owe a debt to this bit of dgc's wizardry. It is lighter weight than VIM, and the source code is understandable and extensible.

I will not get into whether vim or emacs is better; I like emacs, other people like vim, and there's room for all editors around the scheduler. (Except maybe SOS, but nobody that I know of misses SOS.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Linux Format forums Forum Index -> Magazine and coverdiscs All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Linux Format forums topic RSS feed 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


Copyright 2011 Future Publishing, all rights reserved.


Web hosting by UKFast