| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
kamrananvaar LXF regular
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 8:25 am Posts: 383
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kamrananvaar LXF regular
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 8:25 am Posts: 383
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnhudson LXF regular
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 2:37 pm Posts: 767
|
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I once heard that IBM reckoned it would take 5 years for a company committed to open source to migrate completely. Since governments only normally get four years to put their policies into practice, it will never be a government policy for fear the next government will benefit from it - and the costs of migration, e.g. retraining, are primarily up-front; so not really welcome in the current climate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
towy71 Moderator

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:11 pm Posts: 4169 Location: wild West Wales
|
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| johnhudson wrote: | | ..the costs of migration... | I don't unterstand why there should be any intrinsic cost in migrating operating systems if they have been using best practice.
Log in, point and click, get on with it!  _________________ still looking for that door into summer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nordle LXF regular

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:56 pm Posts: 1497
|
Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My previous employment had guys/gals using very complex Excel models with loads of linked spreadsheets and resulting summary data embeded in Word. Yes they could be moved over, but the time it would take would be huge and everyone is running so close to the bone these days that there just isn't the spare capacity to achieve this, however much it is a good idea. _________________ I think, therefore I compile |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnhudson LXF regular
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 2:37 pm Posts: 767
|
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The costs of migration arise because, while most MS Office to OpenOffice is fairly straightforward, Access to whatever Linux combination you use isn't and there are many other programs which are sufficiently different that failing to plan for the move and identify training needs could be very costly.
This was all studied in the 1980s because companies then assumed that there would be little need to train staff and ended up losing business because their staff hadn't had time to learn enough about the new software to be able to use it effectively.
IBM doesn't say things for nothing; it has decades of experience of the sorts of mistakes people (and it) have made in the past. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CJLL LXF regular
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 10:22 pm Posts: 193
|
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| johnhudson wrote: | | I once heard that IBM reckoned it would take 5 years for a company committed to open source to migrate completely. Since governments only normally get four years to put their policies into practice, it will never be a government policy for fear the next government will benefit from it - and the costs of migration, e.g. retraining, are primarily up-front; so not really welcome in the current climate. |
any sign of the National IT project for the NHS being fully up and running yet? They been at that for the last seven/eight years or so.
I think 5 years is a very big underestimate. _________________ --
The reward for self love is sticky hands |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nelz Moderator

Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:52 pm Posts: 8000 Location: Warrington, UK
|
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 12:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think the NHS qualifies as a "company committed to open source". _________________ Unix is user-friendly. It's just very selective about who it's friends are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
towy71 Moderator

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:11 pm Posts: 4169 Location: wild West Wales
|
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nelz wrote: | | I don't think the NHS qualifies as a "company committed to open source". | Most of the people running* the NHS should be committed to somewhere else
*politicians _________________ still looking for that door into summer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
guy LXF regular

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:07 pm Posts: 830 Location: Worcestershire
|
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe the UK government is like many large organizations, and already uses a lot of free software server-side, without knowing it.  _________________ Cheers,
Guy
The eternal noob |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nelz Moderator

Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:52 pm Posts: 8000 Location: Warrington, UK
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you suggesting our government doesn't know what it is doing? :-O _________________ Unix is user-friendly. It's just very selective about who it's friends are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnhudson LXF regular
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 2:37 pm Posts: 767
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It wouldn't be the first time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nordle LXF regular

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:56 pm Posts: 1497
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought maybe Guy was eluding to the "free as in beer" side.
Any large organisation is quite likely to not be entirely correctly licensed. _________________ I think, therefore I compile |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
guy LXF regular

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:07 pm Posts: 830 Location: Worcestershire
|
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lots of IT geeky stuff goes on in the engine rooms of national government departments . The average user tends to get on with their own job, blithely (and usually wrongly) assuming that because they use Windows (TM) and MS Office (TM), all the servers do too.
As for free as in beer, national government is pretty hot on licensing - if anything is unlicensed, it won't be the bureaucrats' fault - probably either a senior droid or a lowly geek - and once unearthed it doesn't last long  _________________ Cheers,
Guy
The eternal noob |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kamrananvaar LXF regular
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 8:25 am Posts: 383
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
UK: Head of IT development Camden: 'Cooperate with open source communities'
Government procuring open source IT should consider how to benefit from collaborating with open source communities, says Alasdair Mangham, head of Information Systems and Development of the London Borough of Camden in the UK. "We need to learn how to become experts at being members of communities rather than experts at governing them."
http://www.osor.eu/news/uk-head-of-it-development-camden-cooperate-with-open-source-communities |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|