What if Linux cost more than Windows?

Discussion topics, Linux related - not requests for help

Moderators: ChrisThornett, LXF moderators

Would you pay for Linux if it were more expensive then Windows?

Yes
2
29%
No
4
57%
Maybe - see below for full reasoning
1
14%
 
Total votes : 7

What if Linux cost more than Windows?

Postby LeeNukes » Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:05 pm

Just a quick debate. I was wondering, would I pay for Linux, the answer is probably yes. However, if asked would I pay for Linux if it were more expensive then Windows. Hmm, maybe not.

Essentially you can assume the comparison here is:

Linux = Ubuntu 9.10
Windows = Windows 7 Home Premium
User avatar
LeeNukes
LXF regular
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:11 pm
Location: At the bar

Postby towy71 » Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:21 pm

£150 for the Microparp bleuch, considering that is just for the os without all the lovely stuff in the Ubuntu repositories, well that is just daylight robbery.
Ubuntu is free but three years support costs £ 185.19 details
That surely has to be a bargain and soooo much more than Steve Balmer and his bunch of monkeys would ever dream of :roll: :roll: :roll:
still looking for that door into summer
User avatar
towy71
Moderator
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 2:11 pm
Location: wild West Wales

Postby Dutch_Master » Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:30 pm

I think the comparison isn't fair. Ubuntu can do so much more then just 'a desktop' that Win-7 "super-restricted-edition" is too cheap. You'd need to compare the fully fledged version (at GBP 800+), including TCO over 3-5 yrs, with a Ubuntu LTS version, also TCO.
Dutch_Master
LXF regular
 
Posts: 2445
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:49 am

Postby gn2 » Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:52 pm

It's a theoretical question, so in theory, yes I would pay more to have Linux.

Thankfully this theoretical situation will not arise. Phew.
User avatar
gn2
LXF regular
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 10:34 pm

Postby Rhakios » Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:01 pm

Sadly, also a false dichotomy. I'd buy a Mac, or use BSD. :)
Bye, Rhakios
User avatar
Rhakios
Moderator
 
Posts: 7634
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:18 pm
Location: Midlands, UK

Postby wyliecoyoteuk » Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:18 pm

Actually, Ubuntu is NOT Linux, and then you must consider that even if it was, the price of Windows doesn't include Office or many other applications that you need, AV, etc.
So comparisons are not really possible.

(and yes I know many OS progs are available for windows too, but you see my point).
The sig between the asterisks is so cool that only REALLY COOL people can even see it!

*************** ************
User avatar
wyliecoyoteuk
LXF regular
 
Posts: 3460
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 10:41 pm
Location: Birmingham, UK

Postby bobthebob1234 » Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:14 pm

OMG PAY FOR LINUX!?!?!?!?!?!

I don't like paying for anything, let along for something that was free!
For certain you have to be lost to find the places that can't be found. Elseways, everyone would know where it was
User avatar
bobthebob1234
LXF regular
 
Posts: 1372
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:38 pm
Location: A hole in a field

Postby Bazza » Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:24 pm

Hi goons...

http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/locutus/how ... inux-35254

;o)

On a more serious note, no Linux is free as downloading
a serious distro takes a large amount of time to do so;
thus taking up sytem BW so other users must losing out.
A magazine offers a DVD of various `free` distros at a cost
for the magazine.
It takes time to download any serious Linux distro, SO, if
time is money then........

At 20 time is immaterial so the cost in time is minimal.
At 30 time is noticeable so the cost in time becomes a little
irritating.
At 40 time is starting to count so the cost in time is
frustrating.
At 50 time is beginning to take it toll so the cost in time
is proportional to your patience.
At 60 time is showing your age so the cost in time is fast
becoming intolerable.
At 70 time is now coming to a close so the cost in time
is more than you can afford.
At 80 time is now very limited and the cost is so prohibitive
that you wish you had enough money to buy a little more.
73...

Bazza, G0LCU...

Team AMIGA...
User avatar
Bazza
LXF regular
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:16 am
Location: Loughborough

Postby LeeNukes » Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:35 pm

wyliecoyoteuk wrote:Actually, Ubuntu is NOT Linux, and then you must consider that even if it was, the price of Windows doesn't include Office or many other applications that you need, AV, etc.
So comparisons are not really possible.

(and yes I know many OS progs are available for windows too, but you see my point).


That's why I said assume Linux = Ubuntu. i know Ubuntu isn't Linux.

Dutch_Master wrote:I think the comparison isn't fair.


Fair for which side?
User avatar
LeeNukes
LXF regular
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:11 pm
Location: At the bar

Postby nelz » Thu Dec 03, 2009 2:08 am

Since we're using Ubuntu as an example here, you can get free Ubuntu CDs from Canonical, no downloading and no buying those pesky magazines that publishers insist sticking on the backs of DVDs.
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." (Albert Einstein)
User avatar
nelz
Site admin
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:52 am
Location: Warrington, UK

Postby Dutch_Master » Thu Dec 03, 2009 2:57 am

LeeNukes wrote:Fair for which side?
Win-7 :P You're putting a very basic and dressed-down version against a Linux distro that offers all one could ask for just a mouse-click away :) So, if you want a fair comparison, put up the "all-singing and all-dancing" Win-7 version against any mainstream Linux distro. And as I said, the price-tag for that is probably 800+ in any currency, but w/o standard programs like Office, Word, etc. ;) And then you still don't know the TCO, what does M$ support cost these days? Again, to be fair, use the price for the equivelent period Ubuntu LTS offers....

I think Canonical could charge massive €€€/$$$/whatever for support and still be cheaper then M$ :roll:
Dutch_Master
LXF regular
 
Posts: 2445
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:49 am


Return to Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests