Linux Format forums Forum Index Linux Format forums
Help, discussion, magazine feedback and more
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

98 Linux PCs

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Linux Format forums Forum Index -> Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wyliecoyoteuk
LXF regular


Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:41 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Birmingham, UK

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:08 pm    Post subject: 98 Linux PCs Reply with quote

Martha Lane Fox has just Announced an initiative to sell 98 Linux PCs refurbished by Remploy.
Let's hope that it is not another well meant but badly implemented scenario.
_________________
The sig between the asterisks is so cool that only REALLY COOL people can even see it!

*************** ************
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rhakios
Moderator


Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:18 am
Posts: 7602
Location: Midlands, UK

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I occasionally read articles from the Helios project, which distributes refurbished Linux PCs in the US. What is sometimes saddening is how often people try to install Windows on them and completely eff up an otherwise fully functioning PC. I foresee the same thing happening all too often if this idea actually comes to pass in the UK.
_________________
Bye, Rhakios
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnhudson
LXF regular


Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 857

PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I see the target is just 8,000 in the first year which will hardly make a dent in the numbers without computers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wyliecoyoteuk
LXF regular


Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:41 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Birmingham, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is only a pilot, let's hope that it does go well
_________________
The sig between the asterisks is so cool that only REALLY COOL people can even see it!

*************** ************
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CJLL
LXF regular


Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 10:22 pm
Posts: 193

PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've tried Ubuntu on old hardware, it really doesn't work very well, and I hate to think a lot of people's first experience of Linux will be a very very poor one!
_________________
--
The reward for self love is sticky hands
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
towy71
Moderator


Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 4242
Location: wild West Wales

PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CJLL wrote:
I've tried Ubuntu on old hardware, it really doesn't work very well, and I hate to think a lot of people's first experience of Linux will be a very very poor one!
I have had great success with Ubuntu on anything from a PIII onwards as long as there was at least 256Meg of RAM, the more RAM the better Wink
_________________
still looking for that door into summer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wyliecoyoteuk
LXF regular


Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:41 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Birmingham, UK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, XP on old hardware is just as bad, but I know people who make a good part-time income from putting together Bootsale parts to build PCs with XP, just to be used for email, IM and web.
Anyway, who mentioned Ubuntu?

For the proposed use, anything that can match an Atom 230 with 1 GB of RAM will work fine.
Our Netbooks and the Kitchen PC (all Atom based) run Ubuntu fine.
_________________
The sig between the asterisks is so cool that only REALLY COOL people can even see it!

*************** ************
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
heiowge
LXF regular


Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:21 pm
Posts: 1892
Location: Cheshire, UK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I tried it on my mum's eeepc. That had 900Mhz of processor and 1 Gb RAM. I got it to run, but XP ran circles round it for speed. The PCs mentioned sound lower spec than the eeepc used, so I can imagine having severe problems.

Have they considered Linux Mint LXDE or Puppy or the like?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CJLL
LXF regular


Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 10:22 pm
Posts: 193

PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

towy71 wrote:
CJLL wrote:
I've tried Ubuntu on old hardware, it really doesn't work very well, and I hate to think a lot of people's first experience of Linux will be a very very poor one!
I have had great success with Ubuntu on anything from a PIII onwards as long as there was at least 256Meg of RAM, the more RAM the better Wink


These were 2.4Ghz Pentium 4s with a whole 1/2 gig of RAM. Never did manage to work out what was slowing them down. Sad
_________________
--
The reward for self love is sticky hands
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wyliecoyoteuk
LXF regular


Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:41 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Birmingham, UK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 7:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Probably the half gig of RAM or the motherboard chipset drivers.
Our netbooks have Atom 1.66GHz processors Intel GMA gfx, 1.5Ghz of ram, and 8 or 16GB SSDs. Running Ubuntu Netbook Edition, they start up in about 11 seconds, shut down in 5 , and are nice to use.
The Kitchen PC is a similar Atom processor, Intel GFX and an 80GB 2.5" HDD, 2GB of ram, runs Full Ubuntu fine.
My wife's PC has a P4 @1.7GHz, 768MB of ram, ATI GFX card, 160GB 3.5" HDD and runs Full Ubuntu with no problems.
Our other PCs are far higher spec, but to be honest, not noticeably faster.

I did notice a huge boost when I upgrade my Netbook from 512MB to 1.5GB, perhaps the GFX using some of the memory slowed it down.
It ran windows7 just about usably ( I tried it as an experiment when I increased the SSD from 8 to 16GB), but there was no room for anything else, and it paged incessantly, not good for an SSD.

I would be surprised if the PCs in question were slower than 900MHz, My wife's PC is nearly 8 years old, and was not exactly cutting edge then.
It did have XPMCE on it for a short while, but it was soon moved to Linux.
It ran Opensuse for years, only recently moved to Ubuntu, and I added an extra 256MB stick which made a big difference in performance terms.


Edited to correct age of wife's PC, I didn't realise it was that old!!
_________________
The sig between the asterisks is so cool that only REALLY COOL people can even see it!

*************** ************


Last edited by wyliecoyoteuk on Fri Jan 21, 2011 9:08 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wyliecoyoteuk
LXF regular


Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:41 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Birmingham, UK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just reading my own post, realised that most of our computing experience is on roughly 1.7GHz single core processors, and until I need to do some photo editing, or writing with a nice big screen and a proper keyboard, that is all we need!
_________________
The sig between the asterisks is so cool that only REALLY COOL people can even see it!

*************** ************
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Linux Format forums Forum Index -> Discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Linux Format forums topic RSS feed 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


Copyright 2011 Future Publishing, all rights reserved.


Web hosting by UKFast