Linux Format forums Forum Index Linux Format forums
Help, discussion, magazine feedback and more
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Memory

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Linux Format forums Forum Index -> Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dhester



Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:19 pm
Posts: 72

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:22 pm    Post subject: Memory Reply with quote

Does increasing the size of physical memory have the same impact on performance as it does in windows.

One of my computers has stopped working and I am thinking instead of trying to get it working again to put the components into one of the other computers running linux.

The machine I am thinking of upgrading has 2Gig of memory at present and I have another 2 gig that could go into the machine.

Would this improve the linux performance?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ajgreeny
LXF regular


Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 453
Location: Oxfordshire.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

2GB of ram should be more than enough for a 32bit Linux OS, but if it is a 64bit OS it may show some worthwhile improvement in speed with the higher amount, of course.
_________________
Xubuntu 12.04 user, and loving it!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wyliecoyoteuk
LXF regular


Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:41 pm
Posts: 3450
Location: Birmingham, UK

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Depends what you are using it for really, Linux generally uses less resources, and swaps to disk less than Windows anyway.
_________________
The sig between the asterisks is so cool that only REALLY COOL people can even see it!

*************** ************
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dhester



Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:19 pm
Posts: 72

PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 11:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I decided to put the extra memory in the linux machine (32bit Mont 12) as I am going to replace the broken computer with a new motherboard which uses different memory anyway.

From my initial test the extra memory does not seam to make any difference, from my previous experience if this had been a windows machine it would have made a significant difference.

Does this mean Linux is memory efficient?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lok1950
LXF regular


Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 6:31 am
Posts: 1029
Location: Ottawa

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Linux does tend to use all resources efficiently not just memory Wink the main issue with Windows memory usage is that memory that has been released by a process is not always returned to available free memory so memory scrubbing apps running all the time have been the norm.Win7 is much better than previous versions but still not as efficient as the Linux kernel Very Happy


Enjoy the Choice Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ben



Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:42 am
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The command 'top' is your friend here. It will show you how the system resources are being used including how much memory is currently free, and how much load is on the processors (and which programs are using them). If you've got plenty of memory free under normal usage, then adding a bit more won't make any difference.

Ben
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bobthebob1234
LXF regular


Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:38 pm
Posts: 1369
Location: A hole in a field

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

htop is prettier... Smile
_________________
For certain you have to be lost to find the places that can't be found. Elseways, everyone would know where it was
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nelz
Site admin


Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:52 pm
Posts: 8464
Location: Warrington, UK

PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe, but free is more informative than either as it differentiates between memory used by applications and that used by buffers and caches. It is the latter that improves performance on Linux, whereas filling up all your RAM with the former kills performance.
_________________
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." (Albert Einstein)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Linux Format forums Forum Index -> Hardware All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Linux Format forums topic RSS feed 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


Copyright 2011 Future Publishing, all rights reserved.


Web hosting by UKFast