| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ggsinclair LXF regular

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 8:41 am Posts: 233 Location: Linlithgow, UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rhakios Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:18 am Posts: 7473 Location: Midlands, UK
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 8:38 pm Post subject: RE: This is good to see! |
|
|
I'd still like to know how they gather these statistics. I have noticed that Opera identifies itself as IE by default and you have to change the setting to get anything else, would most users bother? There is also the issue of people setting their browser's identity as IE to get around stupid website restrictions.
Until one knows the way these statistics are gathered, they are meaningless. _________________ Bye, Rhakios |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ggsinclair LXF regular

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 8:41 am Posts: 233 Location: Linlithgow, UK
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 8:45 pm Post subject: RE: This is good to see! |
|
|
Rhakios
Good point - but it raises the profile of Firefox and, ultimately, open source software.
That cant be a bad thing.
Cheers.
Gordon _________________ Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rhakios Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:18 am Posts: 7473 Location: Midlands, UK
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 8:58 pm Post subject: RE: This is good to see! |
|
|
I can't help wondering if its profile isn't actually higher anyway. _________________ Bye, Rhakios |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jjmac LXF regular
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:32 am Posts: 1996 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 1:44 am Post subject: RE: This is good to see! |
|
|
Yes, unless info is provided on the gathering method(s) used, it does become meaningless. Promotion that results from researches that later are revealed to be erronous, or even doctored, can only have the reverse effect ultimatley. And so should be avoided.
jm
Last edited by jjmac on Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:25 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
linuxgirlie LXF regular

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 7:34 pm Posts: 787 Location: Kent...UK
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:06 am Post subject: RE: This is good to see! |
|
|
I agree, and would love to know how they collect them, are they looking at the browser online at any given time, or do you have to visit certain website? _________________ My knowledge comes with no warranty...........
Server operating system designed for schools:www.linuxschools.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jjmac LXF regular
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:32 am Posts: 1996 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:28 am Post subject: RE: This is good to see! |
|
|
Yes, it sounds a little suspicous to me ... would sites that keep hit counts have info like that available to be botted. Or are they accessing a sites cookie files ???, or something ?
jm _________________ http://counter.li.org
#313537
The FVWM wm -=- www.fvwm.org -=-
Somebody stole my air guitar, It happened just the other day,
But it's ok, 'cause i've got a spare ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nelz Moderator

Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:52 pm Posts: 8002 Location: Warrington, UK
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:11 am Post subject: RE: This is good to see! |
|
|
A browser identifies itself with the USER_AGENT variable. This can be logged by the site. Cookies have nothing to do with it, they are stored by the browser, not the server.
It is indicative, but not too reliable. You can change the User-Agent a browser sends (spoofing) and sometimes have to to get lamely written sites to accept you. A proportion of the hits from IE are actually people using other browsers and spoofing.
The sites you use the gather the statistics also affect the results. msn.com will get a higher proportion of hits from IE than mozilla.org, this site or Slashdot. _________________ Unix is user-friendly. It's just very selective about who it's friends are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cogar
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:50 pm Posts: 59 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Firefox is a good browser. Although I mildly prefer Konqueror, I still use Firefox for just this reason--I want people who run websites to know that people are using browsers other than IE. (I think Konqueror use is such a small percentage that it is typically ignored.) On the other hand, as Firefox use grows, so does its credibility to the general public. In turn, this could lead to more people switching. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M-Saunders Moderator

Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:14 pm Posts: 2881
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You could use Konqueror, but set it to identify itself as Firefox -- two birds, one stone!
M |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nelz Moderator

Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:52 pm Posts: 8002 Location: Warrington, UK
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can IE spoof? Every time someone lets you near a Windows system, set IE to spoof as Firefox  _________________ Unix is user-friendly. It's just very selective about who it's friends are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M0PHP LXF regular

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:40 am Posts: 737 Location: Bishop Auckland, County Durham, UK
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep, to a certain extent, IE can spoof  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nigel LXF regular

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 9:03 pm Posts: 1141 Location: Gloucestershire, UK
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Time to create a .reg file to carry around on my USB key, methinks  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cogar
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:50 pm Posts: 59 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| M-Saunders wrote: | You could use Konqueror, but set it to identify itself as Firefox -- two birds, one stone!
M |
Good idea--one that had not occurred to me for some reason. Thank you.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rhakios Moderator

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:18 am Posts: 7473 Location: Midlands, UK
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:29 pm Post subject: Re: RE: This is good to see! |
|
|
| nelz wrote: | A browser identifies itself with the USER_AGENT variable. This can be logged by the site. Cookies have nothing to do with it, they are stored by the browser, not the server.
It is indicative, but not too reliable. You can change the User-Agent a browser sends (spoofing) and sometimes have to to get lamely written sites to accept you. A proportion of the hits from IE are actually people using other browsers and spoofing.
The sites you use the gather the statistics also affect the results. msn.com will get a higher proportion of hits from IE than mozilla.org, this site or Slashdot. |
The first bits of this post are rather my point. On several occasions I have noted that a fresh install of Opera will use IE for its identification, so any one who installs it and doesn't bother to change it (the vast majority of non-technical users) will be adding to the IE figures.
The again, how often have I changed my browsers ID because of some duff site, only to forget to change it back again for weeks.
It is especially when I bear in mind the number of people I speak to (non-linux users) who say they are using Firefox that I doubt these statistics. _________________ Bye, Rhakios |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|