 |
Linux Format forums Help, discussion, magazine feedback and more
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Nuke LXF regular

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 12:11 pm Posts: 134 Location: Chepstow, UK
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:12 am Post subject: Installing DOS |
|
|
I am getting an old Pentium II going again, intending to install MSDOS 6.22, Windows 95 (on first HD - 545 Mb) and AntiX (on a second HD - 20Gb) in a multi-boot set-up.
I started by partitioning the first HD using cfdisk under a live Slackware CD (Antix would not work - another story), making the first 24Mb for DOS, 200Mb for Win 95, 70 Mb for shared data, and the rest as the Linux Swap. You get the idea - four primary partitons.
Then rebooting with the DOS installation floppy, it asked it it was OK to format the "C:" disk; I accepted and it got on with it. But as soon as it finished, with no by-your-leave, it started formatting the "D:" drive as well - I was not sure if this was the next partion of the first drive (sda2), or the second drive (sdb1). Control-C had no effect (!), so I switched the PC off. Fortunately there was no data on the other partitons.
There seemed to be no way to avoid this arrogant behaviour (I tried it again). I then disconnected the second hard drive (at least to save the time formatting 20Gb), rebooted, and this time it went straight into copying from the floppy onto the now formatted sda1. It never seemed to notice the other partitons on the first drive.
Yet when MSDOS 6.22 came out (1993) there were certainly other OS's around that might have been overwritten on the other drive - OS/2, and MS's own NT. _________________ Unsolved Mysteries of the Universe No 8 :-
Why did they do away with sinks with integral splashbacks? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
guy LXF regular

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:07 pm Posts: 828 Location: Worcestershire
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:42 pm Post subject: Re: Installing DOS |
|
|
| Nuke wrote: | | Yet when MSDOS 6.22 came out (1993) there were certainly other OS's around that might have been overwritten on the other drive - OS/2, and MS's own NT. |
Which is surely why the arrogant behaviour was encouraged, if not deliberately instigated. MS have never looked favourably on dual-boot, not even for two of their own products. _________________ Cheers,
Guy
The eternal noob |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
oldpenguin
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 10:06 am Posts: 8 Location: New England, USA
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
1) Suggest using 6.20 instead.
2) Use syslinux to start a floppy image.
3) I'm sure there are more experienced users here to say why. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|