| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
crispibits LXF regular

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 1:33 pm Posts: 201 Location: Bath
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I reckon being an economic historian is like being economic with the truth. You only teach the bits of history you want people to know about...  _________________ I'm not a spammer - honest! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheDoctor LXF regular
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:02 pm Posts: 325
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Economic history is the historical study of economic change. Maybe the word "historical" here is redundant, since history is the study of change.
There are two economic historians in the current UK cabinet (Gordon Brown and John Reid) and one former British Prime Minister (Harold Wilson) was also an economic historian - although he tended to call himself a statistician. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marrea LXF regular

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:32 pm Posts: 1846 Location: Chilterns, West Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="shifty_ben"] | Quote: |
is that
I suggest to everyone here you are wrong - nominative
You are wrong - accusative |
OK, this is my interpretation - but more than glad for someone to step in and put me right.
I [subject, nominative] suggest [verb] to [preposition] everyone [indirect object, dative] here [adverb] you are wrong [clause, direct object, accusative]
You [subject, nominative] are [verb] wrong [adjective] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
towy71 Moderator

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:11 pm Posts: 4169 Location: wild West Wales
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
towy71 is trying, despairingly, to push all those worms back into the can  _________________ still looking for that door into summer
Last edited by towy71 on Fri Apr 21, 2006 3:24 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shifty_ben LXF regular

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:56 am Posts: 1292 Location: Ipswich
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That looks about right to me, though i have to worry when my jokes are so bad no one even realises they are jokes  _________________ Need a New Signature |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marrea LXF regular

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:32 pm Posts: 1846 Location: Chilterns, West Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| shifty_ben wrote: | EDIT 2: Having followed one of the links from there, it seems we were all wrong. Unless my understanding is wrong, the page that deals with less and fewer suggests that
10 items or less
is as correct as
10 items or fewer is
Strangely the first one makes more sense in my head but I think that is largely due to a massive desensitisation from supermarkets. |
You're not going to stop me now.
"Less" is something you can't define in numbers, such as less butter.
"Fewer" refers to things that can be counted in numbers, such as items in a supermarket.
Therefore the signs above the checkouts should say "10 items or fewer" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
towy71 Moderator

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:11 pm Posts: 4169 Location: wild West Wales
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
towy71 is trying, despairingly, to push all those worms back into the can  _________________ still looking for that door into summer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MartyBartfast LXF regular

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:25 am Posts: 780 Location: Hants, UK
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Marrea wrote: |
You're not going to stop me now.
"Less" is something you can't define in numbers, such as less butter.
"Fewer" refers to things that can be counted in numbers, such as items in a supermarket.
Therefore the signs above the checkouts should say "10 items or fewer" |
So what if you've got 11 packs of butter? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M0PHP LXF regular

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:40 am Posts: 737 Location: Bishop Auckland, County Durham, UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
towy71 Moderator

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:11 pm Posts: 4169 Location: wild West Wales
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marty You can't use this checkout! _________________ still looking for that door into summer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marrea LXF regular

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:32 pm Posts: 1846 Location: Chilterns, West Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| MartyBartfast wrote: |
So what if you've got 11 packs of butter? |
Now what on earth would you want to be doing with 11 packs of butter?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
towy71 Moderator

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 3:11 pm Posts: 4169 Location: wild West Wales
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the mind boggles (no references to Last Tango in Paris please) _________________ still looking for that door into summer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marrea LXF regular

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:32 pm Posts: 1846 Location: Chilterns, West Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, there you go. And what does the second link say?
Even really big supermarkets get this wrong! Checkouts still have signs above them reading "10 items or less" when it should be "10 items or fewer".
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M0PHP LXF regular

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:40 am Posts: 737 Location: Bishop Auckland, County Durham, UK
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That sign looks remarkably like a Tesco one  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheDoctor LXF regular
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:02 pm Posts: 325
|
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Marrea wrote: |
"Less" is something you can't define in numbers, such as less butter.
"Fewer" refers to things that can be counted in numbers, such as items in a supermarket. |
"Fewer" pertains to integers.
"Less" pertains to real numbers.
ie:
| Quote: | | Fewer cows mean less beef. |
not
| Quote: | | Less cows mean fewer beef. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|