Reading spam

Non-computer-related chit-chat

Moderators: ChrisThornett, LXF moderators

Reading spam

Postby nelz » Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:55 am

I've just deleted half a dozen mobile phone spam posts that appeared overnight. I wasn't surprised to see them and they were immediately recognisable (Nokia N95 etc). What was surprising was that each of the threads had up to 30 views.

Are people really so bored at 4am that they have to read spam? :?
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." (Albert Einstein)
User avatar
nelz
Site admin
 
Posts: 8545
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:52 am
Location: Warrington, UK

RE: Reading spam

Postby towy71 » Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:26 am

No, its like a hole in the tooth you can't help running your tongue over :roll:
still looking for that door into summer
User avatar
towy71
Moderator
 
Posts: 4266
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 2:11 pm
Location: wild West Wales

RE: Reading spam

Postby nelz » Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:54 am

You still have teeth? :P
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." (Albert Einstein)
User avatar
nelz
Site admin
 
Posts: 8545
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:52 am
Location: Warrington, UK

Re: RE: Reading spam

Postby towy71 » Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:29 am

nelz wrote:You still have teeth? :P
Just one or two ;-)
still looking for that door into summer
User avatar
towy71
Moderator
 
Posts: 4266
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 2:11 pm
Location: wild West Wales

RE: Re: RE: Reading spam

Postby Rhakios » Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:08 pm

Perhaps it's always the same 30 gullible fools who make the spammers lives worthwhile. They must make their money somewhere.

Oh, if you're a gullible fool reading this, I can get you some genuine herbal viagra. :D
Bye, Rhakios
User avatar
Rhakios
Moderator
 
Posts: 7634
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:18 pm
Location: Midlands, UK

RE: Re: RE: Reading spam

Postby M-Saunders » Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:54 am

I'm still in favour of this idea:

Interpol (or whatever) sends out a load of fake spam messages containing the obligatory link. Gullible fools click the link and fill in their address etc. -- next day Interpol goes round to a few Gullible fools' houses and rip out the phone line. The Press makes a big hoo-hah about it, and scares others from doing the same.

Result = fewer people responding to spam, therefore less spam. I hope. Or am I just dreaming again? :-)

M
User avatar
M-Saunders
LXF regular
 
Posts: 2893
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 12:14 pm

Postby MartyBartfast » Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:32 am

I'm in favour of this idea:

Every time a spam message is received EVERYONE who received it responds with utter nonsense, send them fake names addresses & phone numbers. Therefore the 1000 or so gullible punters who respond to the spam are hidden underneath the 100,000,000 other responses. The whole SPAM idea becomes immediately unworkable and they'll stop.

a bit like this only on a much larger scale

http://www.419eater.com/
I have been touched by his noodly appendage.
User avatar
MartyBartfast
LXF regular
 
Posts: 817
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:25 am
Location: Hants, UK

Re: RE: Re: RE: Reading spam

Postby ollie » Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:45 am

M-Saunders wrote:... Or am I just dreaming again? :-)

M


Your definitely not in the real world! :P

Only by prosecuting the company advertising in the spam will there be any impact on spam - but I think I'm dreaming too! :wink:
User avatar
ollie
Moderator
 
Posts: 2749
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 11:26 am
Location: Bathurst NSW Australia

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Reading spam

Postby Rhakios » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:51 pm

Only 11 reads for the post by VIDIC I just deleted, but then it did have iPhone in the title rather than N95 ;)
Bye, Rhakios
User avatar
Rhakios
Moderator
 
Posts: 7634
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:18 pm
Location: Midlands, UK

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Reading spam

Postby Dutch_Master » Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:09 pm

Ollie, it's even more simple: boycot the company that is advertised. It hurts where it hurts them most: in their wallet. Mind you, sending unsollicited email (i.e. spamming) is still legal in nearly all countries, so prosecuting isn't an option in many cases...
Dutch_Master
LXF regular
 
Posts: 2458
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:49 am

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Reading spam

Postby nordle » Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:05 am

Would some of those reads be google + other search engine bots just cataloging?
I think, therefore I compile
User avatar
nordle
LXF regular
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 9:56 pm

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Reading spam

Postby nelz » Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:54 am

Interesting question. I've just put the subject of the latest one in Google and it came up as the first link. But that spam has 38 reads in a few hours, could they all be search engines (and towy :P)?
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." (Albert Einstein)
User avatar
nelz
Site admin
 
Posts: 8545
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:52 am
Location: Warrington, UK

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Reading spam

Postby MartyBartfast » Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:28 pm

Well I was at least 2, I checked a couple to see who they were and whether all the add had the same Emails. And BTW boycotting the companies won't work in this case 'cos this was scam, they have nothing to sell they're just trying to con some punters into sending them money a-la 419 scams.
I have been touched by his noodly appendage.
User avatar
MartyBartfast
LXF regular
 
Posts: 817
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:25 am
Location: Hants, UK


Return to Off Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests